It's intersting to me to see the various points of view.
Enorian claiming how innocent it is still. Percepetions of
the truth always are different.
NU is seperate from Bloodloch and they made some
clear statements that they wanted.
Strung being in both has seperated these issues and
yet Enorian is trying to cloud them. Again back to perceptions.

Once upon a time a few people did run to Bloodloch.
Enorian did declare war over it and then forced a treaty
over it.

Now, a similar situation has occurred in Enorian.
People are attacking then running into the city when they
find they either are losing or they bite off too much.
NU asked something be done about this. The whole issue
was ignored, distorted. NU Clearly stated - stop
enforcing others or make and enforce your own laws.

Bloodloch has decided it is done being oppressed. Yes
that is exactly what it was. Even with it's lands
back there are 100 troops sitting at it's east gate. I'm sure
the troops aren't there for a picnic. That's a threat to
remind them they must abide by the so called 'fair treaty'
or they will be invaded again.

Again Enorian claims it's just doing the 'right
thing' Is it really?


Penned by my hand on the 6th of Niuran, in the year 173 MA.