Aetolian Game News

Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article
Public News Post #3768

You're really not getting it are you?

Written by: Grand Master Talonnb Silverain
Date: Sunday, November 27th, 2005
Addressed to: Strung Iscariot, General of Scythes


Strung, I've got very tired ot listening to you say the same thing over
and over again so I'll post once here to clear things up that Daskalos
said in rather easy to read form.

Let's see....timeline should do it

BloodLoch lets people who are attacking Enorians hide in their walls.

Enorian tells Bloodloch to stop allowing this to happen since the city
is 'obviously' not involved like everyone seems to claim.

Bloodloch refuses, so what does Enorian do? We fight to force this
sanctuary law into affect to protect our citizens from these attacks or
at least not allow the cowardice to continue.

Enorian conquers Bloodloch, recieves all their land and gains control of
it's walls, which as Daskalos states, you were not present for.

Enorian, not wanting to actually control Bloodloch, hands back over
control of the city to members and creates the treaty which allows you
to get your land back and get you city back on it's feet, putting the
sanctuary law in place.

Now, your little clans have been waging wars against Enorian to take the
same sanctuary law that Bloodloch was forced to create. Now, as Daskalos
said, you did state that your clans were not associated with Bloodloch
and since it was a personal war, Bloodloch was not involved.

All of a sudden, to everyone's suprise (obvious sarcasm here), Bloodloch
says, "Hey! If Enorian is busy dealing with the constant annoyance of
these two non-affiliated clans, let's reject this treaty since they
probably don't want a war right now anyways."

So, let me ask you this. Since Bloodloch and your little clans here are
not affiliated, why do you care what we say to Bloodloch about the
treaty? I thought you were concerned about us putting a sanctuary law in
that is equal to the one in .....oh wait, that's right, they rejected
that law. So does that mean you now have no cause? Oh, another thought,
could he just have been leading up to help Bloodloch stay where it is
now?

Well, those are my thoughts. Personally I do not want a war either, but
I'd like to be able to walk the streets, bash a bit, talk with people,
without worrying about Bloodloch allies attacking me, and when I
actually manage to recover or get my defenses up, they've run to
Bloodloch to hide like most of them do. Make note, I'm not claiming to
be a great fighter, so don't even bother to comment on that.

My two sovereigns worth,
Grand Master Talonnb Silverain

Penned by my hand on the 5th of Niuran, in the year 173 MA.


Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article