Just as the blind man saying "Look", I'd swear that you think your
right.
First off you think I mean that everyone is the same, NO, I know people
are different, some are trolls, others are human, and others are dwarfs,
which means that everyone has certain natural abilities and
restrictions. As an imp which is surprisingly strong for one's size the
ability to hold and swing a sword is no big problem, You happen to fail
to see the jest of the letter that in the first place is none of your
buisness, but since you have let yourself to nose in and poke at me, I
shall have to prove you wrong.

If you read my note again, You will see I mention that certain classes
are able to use certain armor and so I won't repeat myself. You on the
other hand simply restated what I mentioned, that a monk wont be able to
use armor becuse it will impeed his skills (again read my note, instead
of just skimming it).

You then try to attack me by saying, "that anyone who doesnt bother to
hone any skills will find that he not only can't support the weight of
the armor, but can't even figure out which buckle connects to which
strap."- Well, I did mention that ANYONE should be able to LEARN how to
do this, and as a fact I do hone my skills, if you read my note you will
see its a PLEA to ALLOW people the ability to LEARN MORE, not some
idiotic attemt to say that it should be without learning. Again Read My
note which you obviously didn't do.

Nextly, you speak of my argument on knowledge. You say, "Any one person
only really has the capability to retain so much information at any one
time." Well if thats true, then I should have 3 more empty skill sets
becuse I don't have 3 guild skills, so I should have no problem learning
them at all. If you don't understand what I mean, Ill write a little bit
slower so you do understand.

Newbies start out with a certain amount of skill sets (do you follow me
yet?) when they join a guild they are given 2 more (do I still got ya?)
if they continue to stay in the guild and become a full guild member
they recieve the third and final skill set for a total of 3 (this is
basic math if you don't know yet 2 + 1 = 3) so lets put it all together,
someone without a guild has 3 empty slots, someone who was or is in a
guild has none (there full) so unclassed person has actually MORE
CAPACITY to learn than someone who allready is full of skills.

You then mention "This knowledge is never shared to people outside a
guild." but no, you are wrong, if you read my note you will see that
some knowledge is shared, like necromancy, like groves, like taka(sorry
I don't know the name of the monk zaelot skill but hopefully you get the
point). So knowledge is shared as I originally stated again READ MY
NOTE.

Lastly you mention, "Because Epicurus and Averroes have a respect for
all walks of life, as true, unbiased scholoars do, they only teach where
it is appropriate." I don't know what your trying to point out, but if
you mean they will teach anyone anything at anytime then I must say its
true, and not. As allready stated in my letter, they will teach people
anything, but only if you belong to a certain skillset. The guild
teachers should be the ones that teach that, other wise there is no use
for them, ok.. Ill slow it down for you to understand again.

Lets pretend your a cabalist, you go into the guild and learn from Eocik
(or what ever his name is) only the guild skills, This makes him
usefull. If on the other hand you go to Epicurus, or Averroes to learn
say Numerology from them then poor Eocik is not being used to his full
afficiancy, Do you follow?
Good.

As a last request I would like to see you read MY LETTER again, and
maybe Quote me on where I said all this "Drivel" when infact the only
thing comming out of your quill is rubbish.

I hope This points you to my Last letter so that You read it, Illiterate
one.

Misty the imp

Penned by my hand on the 7th of Midsummer, in the year 120 MA.