Aetolian Game News

Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article
Public News Post #741

A response.

Written by: Sir Methuselah Bahir'an
Date: Thursday, November 7th, 2002
Addressed to: Bardic Snapdragon, Karieith Brisingamen, Druidic Minstrel


Greetings, Aetolia, Karieith.

I'm afried I was only partially able to understand your post, as it
seemed quite vague to me. However, on the subject of Landmarks, a few
points are begging to be made.

First of all, some homework needs to be done. There are indeed ten
landmarks. But nine of these effect essence and devotion, and one
affects sunlight. Entirely two diffrent conflicts. The Druids wouldnt
agree to the tenth landmark staying on the Dark aspect, and vica verca
with the Consanguine.

The essence and devotion landmarks are impossible to Balance. There are
nine. Furthurmore, as an Infernal, I can tell you that my Guild seeks
strength and self improvement. Not a vague sort of 'peace'.

Attempts to reach a Landmark treaty have been in exsistance since the
awakening, when the first Sultan and the first Overseer got together
over it. They failed.

Ballads are best written over subjects of epic proportions and content.
The current conflict is great material. Stick to writing.

Regards,
Sir Methuselah Bahir'an

Penned by my hand on the 9th of Slyphian, in the year 84 MA.


Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article