Listen, kid,

You prattle on about innocence and are so set on picking apart the
Chivalrous code of the Infernal Knights, here is a few pointers:

First of all, the code of the Infernals is greatly different from that
of the Paladins. If you so tried to speak with one of them, as I did in
my time as a Knight, you would understand this.

Secondly, while claiming that they do infringe upon their own codes, you
in turn, put the threat of doing the same yourself without showing any
real understanding the code of the Infernal Knights. You do not
understand their differences to the Paladins and if you do, you hardly
acknowledge them.

While I do not agree with the Infernals, nor their principals, I think
it is only fair that I point out the following to you:

II. Even the lowest of sentients deserve the respect of a Knight of the
Code. Thusly granted before engaging in combat, respect must be shown by
the Knight even if it goes unanswered.

Which, albeit loosely, the Lady Kylari has done.

You claim the Sentinels are "innocent bystanders". How can you possibly
justify this? Is a Paladin Knight walking through a village genuinely
looking out for the villagers under wanton slaughter, or is he or she
merely "passing by"?

Much like the Paladins, every single Sentinel has sworn themselves to an
oath. Every single Sentinel knew what they were letting themselves in
for, it is time for them to decide if they have the Integrity to stand
besides those oaths, or simply offer the lip service required to gain
some standing in the guild.

In summary: The Infernals have openly declared their hostilities towards
those Sentinels in advance, it is up to them to respond in kind.

~Sir Asilient Windrayn


Penned by my hand on the 3rd of Haernos, in the year 242 MA.