Aetolian Game News

Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article
Public News Post #2921

Duiran's actions

Written by: Champion of Darkness, Ansury Tercetto, Blade of Arion
Date: Thursday, February 10th, 2005
Addressed to: Malhavoc O'Lyryus-Ohmsford


Ah yes, Duiran has the right to remove any wilderness from the control
of a city? Perhaps you missed a lesson or two in politics. Simply
declaring that you 'protect nature' does not exactly grant you the right
to remove any territory at whim from the city that controls it.
Naturally, repercussions will follow, as they will in this case.

I do not believe herbs/elixers are any sort of issue here. The matter
does not pertain to them, the matter strictly deals with territory. So
you have the ability to make elixers and harvest herbs, well done, we
also have a unique ability to destroy any forest. Threatening a moot
point because you have the 'ability' is quite laughable, especially when
our ability threatens the very life you hold so dear.

As for Duiran taking lands during the Enorian conflict, this fact is
irrefutable. In fact, Bloodloch was much too lenient with Duiran's
aggressive actions. Now, this so called 'invasion' into the Morgun,
which for the record was a river, was done because of the lands that
were previously captured. Frances and the rest of Duiran wish to
exaggerate the facts and hide their actions and motives in any point
they can find, no matter how weak of a point it is. If you wish to take
lands and come against us then do it openly and not hide like cowards
behind a make belief scenario where Bloodloch is the relentless
agressor.

If you want a war, then so be it. This will be most enjoyable.

Ansury

Penned by my hand on the 10th of Lleian, in the year 150 MA.


Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article