This boils down to a simply term that all can understand. You have the
choice, and in Bloodloch's case, a choice with effort, in who you ally.
Your leaders will be slain for their choice in allowing one whom attacks
Enorian citizens for the sake of being a citizen to hide within your
walls. I am not asking you to hand over a citizen, but one whom you have
given ally status. If Daskalos, Talinon or Hyeil went into Ashtan, I'm
more the positive not only would you have asked for them to be removed,
but Ashtan would want them out of their city because it'll cause
problems for them to deal with. Now it is your city that is allowing
this to happen by its choice. I am sick of chasing people into your city
that are not citizens, now most of them I wouldn't complain about, but
Yos has attacked Enorian citizens because he doesn't like a rule the
city made. Bloodloch has chosen to support his actions by allowing him
to retain his ally status. So your city leaders will face the same wrath
that he is to face.

You act like you have no choice in the matter, if you have no choice,
why are you a leader of Bloodloch? Are you not elected to guide and make
choices for the city? Choose to remove Yos, or choose to mist when
outside of Bloodloch, in the case of the two mortals on the council, the
Mirror will suffice, and your heads will be placed around the world as a
warning. Choose wisely for what is best for your citizens. Or better yet
we'll let them face the same threat the citizens of Enorian face and be
slain on sight outside of your empty walls.

May Rahn guide my hand as I slay you, or grant you the wisdom you need
to be able to make a wise choice.

In Pain and Strife,
Clio Thetis,
The Wrath

Penned by my hand on the 10th of Khepary, in the year 145 MA.